POLO Trial: PFS Increased With Olaparib As Maintenance Therapy For BRCA+ Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

POLO Trial: PFS Increased With Olaparib As Maintenance Therapy For BRCA+ Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Annual-Meeting

6 months
131 Views
Share
Want to watch this again later?
Sign in to add this video to a playlist. Login
0 0
Category:
Description:
Michael Hall, MD Of Fox Chase Cancer Center Discusses POLO Trial: PFS Increased With Olaparib As Maintenance Therapy For BRCA+ Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer. The PARP inhibitor olaparib (Lynparza) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with germline BRCA-mutated metastatic pancreatic cancer compared to placebo when used as maintenance therapy in the phase III POLO trial, presented at the 2019 ASCO Annual Meeting.1,2 Overall, the median PFS was 7.4 months with olaparib versus 3.8 months with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35-0.82; P = .004). This is the first positive phase III trial of any PARP inhibitor in germline BRCA-mutated metastatic pancreatic cancer, a devastating disease with critical unmet need. Most patients are diagnosed late, leaving them with a poor prognosis and very limited treatment options. Based on POLO, Lynparza becomes the first PARP inhibitor to demonstrate positive phase III results beyond ovarian cancer and breast cancer, José Baselga, MD, PhD, executive vice president, Research and Development, Oncology, AstraZeneca, said in a press release announcing the positive data in February.3 In the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial, researchers evaluated the efficacy of olaparib as maintenance therapy in 154 patients who had a germline BRCA1or BRCA2mutation and metastatic pancreatic cancer, which had not progressed during first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomized 3:2 to receive oral olaparib tablets at 300 mg twice daily as maintenance therapy (n = 92) versus placebo, also twice daily (n = 62). Randomization occurred within 6 weeks following last chemotherapy dose and olaparib/placebo treatment began within 4 to 8 weeks of the last chemotherapy dose. Following randomization, patients had weekly clinical visits for the first 4 weeks of treatment, then every 4 weeks while on study treatment. The median duration of treatment was 6 months for those taking olaparib and 3.7 months for people who received a placebo. Treatment continued until objective radiological disease progression. Following progression, patients were followed for second progression every 8 weeks, and then for survival until final analysis. Eligible patients were previously treated for metastatic disease and had not progressed following completion of at least 16 weeks of frontline platinum-based chemotherapy. Additionally, patients had to have a known deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCAmutation. Those who were previously treated with a PARP inhibitor were excluded. The primary endpoint was PFS by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), time from randomization to second progression or death, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), safety, and tolerability. Patients in the treatment arm were a median age of 57 years, 58% were male, and 71% had an ECOG performance status of 0. Two-thirds of patients had BRCA2 mutations, and the remainder had BRCA1mutations. Median PFS was consistent irrespective of response to prior platinum-based chemotherapy (complete/partial HR, 0.62; stable disease HR, 0.50). At 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, the percentage of patients who were progression-free in the olaparib arm was more than twice that in the placebo arm (6-month PFS, 53% vs 23%). The ORR was 23.1% with olaparib compared with 11.5% in the placebo arm. Two patients treated with olaparib had a complete response, both of which were ongoing at data cutoff. The median duration of response was 24.9 months in the olaparib arm versus 3.7 months with placebo. After 1 year, 33.7% of patients receiving olaparib showed no signs of disease progression compared with 14.5% of those who received a placebo. An interim analysis of OS at data maturity of 46% demonstrated no difference between arms (median OS, 18.9 vs 18.1 months; HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.56-1.46; P= .68). In addition, the researchers saw no significant difference in health-related quality of life. There were no new safety signals with olaparib. Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) occurred in 40% of patients in the olaparib arm compared with 23% of those in the placebo arm (95% CI, ?0.02% to 31%). In total, 5.5% and 1.7% of patients, respectively, discontinued treatment due to an AE. We are eagerly awaiting longer-term data to understand the full impact of the results from this trial. Its encouraging to see that olaparib is consistently delaying the progression of metastatic pancreatic cancer in patients with a BRCAmutation. Were potentially on the cusp of a new age of treatment for pancreatic cancer, where for the first time we can tailor therapy based on a biomarker and where having a BRCAmutation opens up more treatment options, said ASCO Expert Suzanne Cole, MD.
Up Next Autoplay
Lymphopenia: How This Affects Clinicians and Treatment Today @CleClinicNews
Lymphopenia: How This Affects Clinicians and Treatment Today @CleClinicNews
Category: Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
0 Views
Cancer-News 9 hours
HORIZON Study #ASH19 @RushMedical
HORIZON Study #ASH19 @RushMedical
Category: Multiple Myeloma
0 Views
ash 9 hours
Immune Status, Inflammation Can Predict Mortality @CleClinicNews @CleClinicMD
Immune Status, Inflammation Can Predict Mortality @CleClinicNews @CleClinicMD
Category: Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
0 Views
Cancer-News 9 hours
Phase I Study of Duvelisib in CLL/SLL #ASH19 #ASH @DanaFarber
Phase I Study of Duvelisib in CLL/SLL #ASH19 #ASH @DanaFarber
Category: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
9 Views
ash 18 hours
MANIFEST, a Phase 2 Study of CPI-0610 @MountSinaiNYC #ASH #ASH19
MANIFEST, a Phase 2 Study of CPI-0610 @MountSinaiNYC #ASH #ASH19
Category: Other
0 Views
ash 19 hours
Phase I Study Evaluating NKTR-255 in MM and NHL #ASH #ASH19 @DanaFarber
Phase I Study Evaluating NKTR-255 in MM and NHL #ASH #ASH19 @DanaFarber
Category: Multiple Myeloma
0 Views
ash 1 day
Nektar Therapeutics Announces Presentation of New Preclinical Data for its IL-15 Agonist, NKTR-255, at the American Society of  Hematology (ASH) 2019 Annual Meeting
Nektar Therapeutics Announces Presentation of New Preclinical Data for its IL-15 Agonist, NKTR-255, at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) 2019 Annual Meeting
Category: Immunotherapy
2 Views
cancernewsupdate 1 day
New PreClinical Data for its IL-15 Agonist, NKTR-255 #ASH19 #ASH
New PreClinical Data for its IL-15 Agonist, NKTR-255 #ASH19 #ASH
Category: Immunotherapy
1 Views
ash 1 day
Novartis Kisqali® data show superior overall survival compared to fulvestrant and consistent efficacy across advanced breast cancer patient subgroups in MONALEESA-3
Novartis Kisqali® data show superior overall survival compared to fulvestrant and consistent efficacy across advanced breast cancer patient subgroups in MONALEESA-3
Category: Breast Cancer
2 Views
cancernewsupdate 1 day
Venetoclax-Rituximab (VenR) in Relapsed Refractory (R/R) CLL: How This Affects Clinicians? #ASH19 #ASH
Venetoclax-Rituximab (VenR) in Relapsed Refractory (R/R) CLL: How This Affects Clinicians? #ASH19 #ASH
Category: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
0 Views
ash 1 day